Files
soft_quay/docs/review
ilaandClaude Fable 5 1bc4504913 Add Phase 5 review cross-check ruling
Concede two errors in the original review: it cited 01-vision.md for a
'perpetual offline use' promise the vision never makes (only 'offline
verifiable'), and it described the clock-rollback check too broadly -
that check only covers same-list rollback, not an older list paired
with a correspondingly rolled-back clock.

Accept Codex's O5 (verified: StoreRevocations replaces the cache after
signature check with no cross-list monotonicity, so signed revocation
lists can be replayed) and O6, plus four precision refinements. Add the
threat-boundary rationale for O5: monotonicity does not stop a local
attacker but does stop distribution-channel replay, a ~38-day revocation
rollback window is exploitable without any clock control, and benign CDN
staleness alone silently rolls back revocation state - making the
'reject older list' check a correctness requirement, not just hardening.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-20 10:28:08 +08:00
..